About the Justice Index
The Justice Index is an online resource that relies on findings, indicators, indexing and other data-analytics tools to help ensure that a person’s ability to protect and vindicate her rights in a state justice system does not depend on whether she can afford a lawyer, speak and understand English, or navigate the legal system without an accommodation due to a physical or mental disability.
The Justice Index scores and ranks the 50 states, District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico on their adoption of selected best practices for ensuring access to justice, creating incentives for state officials to replicate those practices.
The Justice Index also shows where the best practices are present and where they are absent, making it easy for everyone to see and identify the practices, and easy for state officials to take steps to adopt them. (See “Our Vision” to learn more about our mission and about access to justice).
The National Center for Access to Justice (“NCAJ”) launched the Justice Index in 2014 using data collected in 2012 and 2013 (See the 2014 Justice Index here.) At the time of its launch, the original Justice Index was the first publicly available resource of its kind. The Justice Index 2016 is now updated and expanded, and contains new data collected in 2015.
More Data, Indicators, and Sources
As detailed in the chart below, Justice Index 2016 now contains 68 more indicators, 3,593 more data points, and 2,270 more cited sources than Justice Index 2014. Justice Index 2016 now also includes, for the first time, Puerto Rico.
Justice Index 2014
Justice Index 2016
Total Data Points
Attorney Count Findings
Legal Aid Organizations
For “Yes” Findings
For “No” Findings
In Justice Index 2016, we have added new indicators, modified others, and deleted some as well. The 2016 indicators all set forth in the Justice Index’s familiar four categories: Attorney Access, Self-Representation, Language Access, and Disability Access. Some of the more notable changes in indicators include the following:
- Self-Representation – New indicators track the use of court forms for seven different types of legal cases, track the presence or absence of certain “civil right to counsel” laws, track the use of policies for gathering data on appointments of free counsel, and track policies regarding the accessibility of waivers for court filing fees.
- Language Access – New indicators track policies for interpreting and translating in 12 different types of legal cases.
- Disability Access – New indicators track policies for assuring access to justice for people with mental disabilities.
- Attorney Access – A new indicator now tracks the number of civil legal aid attorneys in each state. Also, the indicator tracking the ratio of civil legal aid lawyers to 10,000 people in poverty has been modified; it now relies on a definition of poverty that is “200% of the federal poverty line” rather than “125% of the federal poverty line.”
In addition, visitors to justiceindex.org can now view and download the highlights of Justice Index 2016 and selected expanded data sets. Links for this purpose are posted on the Findings 2016 page and on each of the four subject matter indexes landing pages.
Refined Research Methodology
To research Justice Index 2016, NCAJ used a new methodology. NCAJ invited all chief justices and chief court administrators to answer a questionnaire about their jurisdictions’ laws, rules, and policies, and also made calls to obtain names of court employees in all 52 jurisdictions with whom to communicate about the questionnaire. The 2016 methodology is described here. The 2014 methodology is described here.
For further information, see our FAQ.
Visitors to the Justice Index 2016 are encouraged to examine and compare the specific findings contained in the 2014 and 2016 versions of the Justice Index. Some important caveats, however, should be kept in mind when making such comparisons:
- In light of the changes made in Justice Index 2016, the picture of performance that is presented in Justice Index 2016 is more thorough and more precise than the picture presented in Justice Index 2014.
- The changes in indicators between the two versions of the Justice Index – which, as described above, include expansions, modifications, and deletions – should caution against drawing automatic conclusions about performance based on changes in rankings and scores in the Composite Index and in the four subject matter indexes.
- As noted above, the indicator tracking the ratio of civil legal aid lawyers per 10,000 people in poverty has been modified; it now relies on a definition of poverty that is “200% of the federal poverty line” rather than “125% of the federal poverty line.”
- If your state (or one you are studying) has had a significant change in results between 2014 and 2016, please look closely at the indicators and at the findings to understand why. If you would like to receive assistance with this analysis, please contact us at email@example.com and we will be happy to help.
NCAJ is fully committed to continue the process of strengthening the Justice Index so that it will become an even more powerful and precise resource, and so that it can be used to track changes in performance of access to state justice systems over time.